On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 14:44 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Some drivers might support 80 or 160 MHz only on some > > channels for whatever reason, so allow them to disable > > these channel widths. Also maintain the new flags when > > regulatory bandwidth limitations would disable these > > wide channels. > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > We need something to spell out VHT80 and VHT160 as a capability for > debugging on ht_print_chan(). Well, not sure. I don't have VHT80 bits like HT40+/-, I only have "can do 80 MHz on this channel", and the next patch advertises it to nl80211 anyway so we can use iw to dump it. > This patch also seems to depend on a > patch posted as RFC, not PATCH. Yeah that's probably true. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
