On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 12:10 +0530, vivekanandah@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > presently in code, the block ack policy is not sent by mac80211 to the > lower level driver via the ampdu_action callback. > > The mac80211 while transmitting a block ack (ADDBA)request, hardcodes > the block ack methodology to immediate block ack. > > on the receive side, the delayed block ack bit is checked along-with > the capability of the receiver station to support delayed block ack. > even if the station supports delayed block ack, mac80211 does not send > the ba_policy down to the driver. > > should ba_policy be sent to the driver so that lower level drivers can > take a call as to send block ack response in a delayed manner at its > convenience? Well, if you wanted to support it, you'd first have to change the negotiation to actually ask for it, no? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
