Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 16/24] regulatory: clarify locking rules and assertions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> > The reason for this is that nl80211 uses the regdom
> > without being able to hold reg_mutex.
> 
> Hm, do we want to do this or add a caller to reg.c that gets nl80211
> to copy over the current regdomain over for it to parse and then send?
> In that case we'd only need the cfg80211_mutex for
> update_all_wiphy_regulatory(). Thoughts?

I think you should look at the later patches :)

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux