Adrian Chadd wrote: > Just a general comment - wouldn't it be cleaner to have the PCI IDs > and the EEPROM definitions pulled from the ath9k driver source or a > separate header file, so you don't run the risk of having definitions > "drift" slightly? > > I doubt that anyone is going to change the cal data format or the > default templates very often (or at all!), but .. just having those > definitions duplicated feels wrong to me. Yes, this would be neat, we should probably be in sync with the headers in the driver source. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
