On Jan 8, 2008 7:22 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 18:09 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > I didn't test the copy solution yet but in 11n rates I see as a show > > > stopper. All 11n packets are QoS packets. > > > > Really, go fix your firmware. > I don't think it is really broken. The packet it self is aligned. I'm not sure who has to be responsible for payload alignment you may have 10 other protocols packed into it, each with variable length unaligned header. > I meant to write more here but accidentally deleted parts when > restructuring. The firmware should insert padding to make sure the > payload is aligned on a four-byte boundary at all times when the start > of the DMA area is aligned that way. > I understand that I'll see what can be done, yet I don't like it Tomas > johannes > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
