> Eeek, yes, its the LED core's fault. > dc47206e552c0850ad11f7e9a1fca0a3c92f5d65 is needed for various reasons > but that means the patch below is also needed. Its been compile tested, > once its runtime tested I'll push asap. Any reason you're using an rw semaphore rather than a simple mutex? Nothing here is a hot-path, is it, and the led registrations are mutually exclusive anyway, no? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
