From: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:22:10 -0500 > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 16:11 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:23:23 -0500 > > > > > Is this an unconditional NAK for any changes to WEXT? > > > > Well, it is at least completely proven that you cannot > > extend the structures without crapping all over random > > areas of the stack space of the user application. > > > > So at a minimum you're going to get NAKs for any patch > > that does things that way. > > So would another WEXT subcommand be acceptable to you? I might find using the existing spare space bearable, but even that is a stretch. We need to completely deprecate WEXT as fast as possible and adding new features to it won't help that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
