On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 16:11 -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:23:23 -0500 > > > Is this an unconditional NAK for any changes to WEXT? > > Well, it is at least completely proven that you cannot > extend the structures without crapping all over random > areas of the stack space of the user application. > > So at a minimum you're going to get NAKs for any patch > that does things that way. So would another WEXT subcommand be acceptable to you? Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
