> won't this conflict with drivers that want to use their own rate scaling > modules? (like iwl3945/4965) The rate control algorithm should be per-hw struct. We still don't have the "driver preference" patch applied because of some things, but in any case it is possible to have an algorithm for each hw. Besides, currently, afaict, if you first load rc80211_simple and then iwlwifi, the latter doesn't really work well if at all due to simple being used. That needs to be fixed anyway, the right solution is that patch we were discussing a long time ago with driver preference for rate control algorithm (though ISTR there were still some issues with it and I don't remember whether the initial version was applied) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
