On Thursday 27 September 2007 23:12:43 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Thursday 27 September 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 September 2007 22:54:44 Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > @@ -2401,8 +2401,7 @@ static void b43_periodic_every1sec(struc
> > > > radio_hw_enable = b43_is_hw_radio_enabled(dev);
> > > > if (unlikely(dev->radio_hw_enable != radio_hw_enable)) {
> > > > dev->radio_hw_enable = radio_hw_enable;
> > > > - b43info(dev->wl, "Radio hardware status changed to %s\n",
> > > > - radio_hw_enable ? "ENABLED" : "DISABLED");
> > > > + b43_rfkill_toggled(dev, radio_hw_enable);
> > >
> > > Isn't it better to use the input_polldev for scheduled input device checking?
> > >
> > > > +static void b43_notify_rfkill_press(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct b43_rfkill *rfk = container_of(work, struct b43_rfkill,
> > > > + notify_work);
> > > > + struct b43_wl *wl = container_of(rfk, struct b43_wl, rfkill);
> > > > + struct b43_wldev *dev;
> > > > + enum rfkill_state state;
> > >
> > > Same here, input_polldev was created especially for hardware
> > > devices that don't trigger interrupts when the button was pressed.
> >
> > Ah, well. Will change that later. This works for now.
>
> It might work, but this means that userspace is not made aware of
> the key toggling and would thus make rfkill useless in this case.
Yeah, sure. But it's not useless. The other functionality is still available.
I'll fix that. But in a seperate patch. No need to delay this one because
of this (IMO) minor issue.
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
