On 9/26/07, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 13:46 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > > > The only problem I see with not doing this is that hostapd will have to > > > listen for EAPOL frames on all VLAN interfaces but I suppose that is > > > doable. > > > > > I wonder of port control is done for ethernet. 1X is not WLAN invention. > > I'll try to dig it. > > I haven't ever seen it, but I'm not sure. I'm sure. > > > > > The problem is the order of the handlers. First you need to > > > > deaggregated the frame then filtered out non EAPLOL frames if the port > > > > is not open. > > > > > > Yeah, I know, I had a plan a while back, will see if I can implement it. > > > > > Hope to get there as well in near future. > > Ok, let me know what you plan to do. John has pushed the deagg patch > into the "dungeon" branch so it's still there for reference. Oh... another victim. Getting lost in current patch movement... Looks like most of the decision are happening somewhere else... > johannes > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
