Hey, I just looked at the deaggregation code for unrelated reasons and thought about it a bit more; shouldn't there be some sort of checks that the 802.11 rules about identical addresses are adhered to to avoid having rogue packets pretending to come from somewhere else enter the networking stack? This can usually be avoided by using RSNA, but this code allows one to easily circumvent this which makes us look pretty bad. Makes you wonder why they included full 802.3 framing in the subframes... johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
