2007/8/30, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:38:09AM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > > 2007/8/28, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Also this whole patch seems rather pointless. It saves only > > > very little and turns the driver into a complete ifdef maze. > > > Also most > > people will use 5212 code only, 5211 cards are on some old laptops and > > 5210, well i couldn't even find a 5210 for actual testing :P > > FWIW, I'd bet dollars to donuts that distros will enable them all > together. > > Is saving code space the only reason to turn these off? How much > space do you save? > > Is there some way you can isolate and/or limit the number of ifdef > blocks further? If so, we might consider a version of this patch > that depends on EMBEDDED or somesuch...? > > John O.K. as a first step i'll limit 5210 code only then, just an option like "support older 5210 chipsets" which is going to be off by default instead of 3 options. It's not just saving space, it's also saving some runtime checks. It's not really a gain in performance though, most checks are done during initialization and dfs setup, i just thought it would be usefull to save as much cpu as possible. -- GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-) Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
