On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 13:46 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > Exactly. This is one of things that should be solved in the patch > mentioned below. I suppose you mean this patch http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/2303 > > Apply the patch already? IIRC James made a pretty good one around that > > time to let the driver choose a default name as part of the hw structure > > it registers and it can be NULL for the default. > > > > Of course, in a perfect world we'd have a 'default' rate control setting > > somewhere and apply that for drivers that have rate_control==NULL, while > > default would default to 'simple' to avoid the issue above. > > I'd really like to see that in the patch. Seems to be a real issue. Except that we have no API for that (should be in cfg80211.) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
