On 7/17/07, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 7/11/07, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:35:00PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > I don't really see the big problem anyhow. As long as we don't want any > > patches in upstream that depend on the refactoring we can delay pushing > > the refactoring upstream. Once we do get patches we can decide to either > > make two versions of them or at some point push the refactoring upstream > > as well; problems will only arise if we delay too much pushing patches > > upstream that are before the refactoring, those would need to be > > rediffed. > > The normal Linux aproach is to push the refactoring as soon as possible. > That way the other changes have to be rebased once and than you're done > with it. If you keep the big refactoring in some staging tree porting > things forth and back will be an endless pain. This is true but the idea is to try to merge wireless-dev into wireless-2.6 ASAP. We shouldn't stop wireless-dev tree changes as that is what we need to help with development. I can only see this helping us down the road. Jiri -- are you sure? :)
Nevermind... Johannes' patches won't apply anymore, except for the ones he pinged about for recently... Luis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
