On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:29 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > But even if it can be applied upstream, it doesn't solve anything. Imagine > a patch which was merged into wireless-dev before this restructuring and > which is not upstream. Merging it upstream would mean taking the patch from > wireless-dev git and manually modifying it to fit a new structure. And we > have a bunch of such patches which should go to 2.6.24 (yes, I really > mean .24). Perhaps I'm lazy, but I'd like to avoid that. It's going to be a > lot of unpleasant work even without this... Which all goes to say that pushing mac80211 for .22 was too fast. joahnnes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
