Search Linux Wireless

Re: [Take 2] mac80211 IEEE802.11e/WMM code cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 16 June 2007 05:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
> No, it's not unnecessary. In London, we said that we wanted the
> (userspace) MLME to be controllable via nl80211 from userspace.
I think that decision was made without much consideration to the 
implementation details. I thought it was a good idea then, but passing 
messages from userspace to the kernel and then to userspace again is really a 
waste of time. NetworkManager already uses wpa_supplicant to avoid all the 
nasty details of dealing with wireless configuration, so why not keep using 
it for everything instead of hiding wpa_supplicant behind nl80211? This is 
more simple and direct and allows the kernel to expose exactly what the 
hardware/kernel can do. Userspace won't have to change much and nl80211 won't 
have to support every possible thing a userspace MLME would want.

-Michael Wu

Attachment: pgpVWBnhS1fNS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux