On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 09:35 -0700, Michael Wu wrote: > On Thursday 14 June 2007 00:36, Johannes Berg wrote: > > For me, that settles the DLS API. That API is easily implementable by > > the userspace MLME as well. > > > This API is unnecessary. The most that is needed is a bit indicating whether > or not an sta_info entry is DLS or not. No, it's not unnecessary. In London, we said that we wanted the (userspace) MLME to be controllable via nl80211 from userspace. Hence, we need API to do DLS setup/teardown because the (userspace) MLME is not going to be the program making the decision about DLS and we explicitly said that we want the MLME to be controllable via nl80211 no matter where it lives. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
