On Monday 14 May 2007 16:55, Michael Wu wrote: > On Monday 14 May 2007 02:49, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > > For the record: I am still not happy with the removal of the udelay() from > > the pulse methods as they were indicated by the original Ralink code. > > But since I cannot test the effect on Ralink eeprom reading at this time, > > and I could otherwise just add it to the register_write handler if > > required, I am signing this off anyway. > > > The udelay is necessary to set a limit on how fast the eeprom is operated.. > but not on all hardware, apparently. adm8211 just uses a read from the eeprom > register to perform the delay. Ok, then I'll update rt2x00 to perform the delay during register_write as well. :) Ivo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
