On Monday 14 May 2007 02:49, Ivo Van Doorn wrote: > For the record: I am still not happy with the removal of the udelay() from > the pulse methods as they were indicated by the original Ralink code. > But since I cannot test the effect on Ralink eeprom reading at this time, > and I could otherwise just add it to the register_write handler if > required, I am signing this off anyway. > The udelay is necessary to set a limit on how fast the eeprom is operated.. but not on all hardware, apparently. adm8211 just uses a read from the eeprom register to perform the delay. Thanks, -Michael Wu
Attachment:
pgpgp7AXTxNjw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
