Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] wext: allow wext users without rtnl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 14:09 -0700, David Miller wrote:

> > NACK Conditional locking is bad design.
> > Either lock or not, make up your mind and fix the devices.

That was because I don't think we can go fixing all current wext users
which might even be out of tree.

> It is also wrong because all entities in the kernel assume
> that network configuration changes all occur under the RTNL
> therefore it must be held consistently everywhere.

So you're saying that cfg80211 should hold rtnl too? I don't see any
point in holding rtnl (for example) for setting the SSID of a wireless
device.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux