> <shrug> Probably because of the confrontation tone of the entire > thread. Everybody's on the offensive, and not willing to admit mistakes. Oh, for sure I know that is what is going on. Only one person has admitted a mistake thus far, and it was Marcus Glocker, in his first post to the thread. After that, Michael got to the point of saying that he does not believe that Marcus made a mistake. Therefore Michael has further entrenched his position. > A private email SHOULD be the first approach for a copyright issue like > this, regardless of whether its a private person or a corp. > > > > Shall I keep replying until everyone gets it? > > Whatever makes you happy :) It makes me happy to show that I have empathy for a situation where someone who puts hundreds of hours of work in as a hobby, and to defend that person. It makes me extremely unhappy that I have to do so, and that some other people think this is a non-event. > > <rest deleted, because the above line is so important> > > Snipped? I presume, then, you admit you are misrepresenting others' > opinions in this thread. No, there was a side discussion about whitespace and variable naming, and even algorithms covered by the GPL. Gimme a break. These were essentially claimed by some of the examples shown by Michael. Go look carefully. That said, there were more real issues, and those have been dealt with in a reply from Marcus, plus the driver now being deleted. The Italian dude in particular was complaining bitterly in private mail about the whitespace similarities... good grief, not whitespace similarities. How SCO of him. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
