On Thursday 05 April 2007 21:29, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > The way they chose to "notify" Marcus shows a complete lack of > > > respect for Marcus. > > > > The way OpenBSD folks used our code was a complete lack of respect > > for us. Fullstop. > > You refuse to accept it was an accident. Therefore we refuse to > accept that your public posting was an accident. Both exactly right. > You publically > attacked another open source developer for a specific purpose. You > are an inhuman asshole, out to make a public fuss about something, > when you had a choice to tell him in private. *clap clap clap* Nice show, Theo. Insulting people is always the way to get an issue solved. > You got what you wanted -- the driver has been deleted. I never said I wanted the driver to be deleted. Re-read the whole thread please. But switch your "turn the meaning of sentences over" device off first, please. > > > As Theo expressed in the thread, there is NO > > > DOUBT that they would have notified a corporation privately. Why > > > would you treat an individual, working on the code out of their own > > > desire, with less respect? > > > > This is a lie. > > Read the whole thread again! > > Jason Dixon is a liar because he doubts something? How can he be a This sentence is the prove that you don't read mails exactly before replying. Jason did not "doubt something". He wrote [citing]: "there is NO DOUBT that they would have notified a corporation privately" Note the capitalized words. This is a plain lie. There is no special exception from me to companies. I already said that in another mail. > liar if he is stating something he believes? Let me rephrase it: He > believes you would treat a company better than you treated Marcus. > > Where's the lie? -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
