John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:18:28AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: >> In code manipulating the TM State Low register of 802.11 cores, two >> different magic numbers are used to reference the 'G Mode Enable' bit. >> One of these, 0x20000000, is clear, but the other, (0x800 << 18), is not. >> This patch replaces both types with a defined constant. In addition, two >> bits in the TM State High registers are given definitions to help in >> following the code. > > Looks reasonable to me -- not sure why this is an RFC? Does anyone > object? Not so far. I'll make it a proper patch. Larry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html