On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:18:28AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > In code manipulating the TM State Low register of 802.11 cores, two > different magic numbers are used to reference the 'G Mode Enable' bit. > One of these, 0x20000000, is clear, but the other, (0x800 << 18), is not. > This patch replaces both types with a defined constant. In addition, two > bits in the TM State High registers are given definitions to help in > following the code. Looks reasonable to me -- not sure why this is an RFC? Does anyone object? John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
