On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 08:24 +0000, Andy Green wrote: > I guess I'll stick with sysfs for now since the code is written already: > if I will find add_iface and so on down there then I guess it will all > work out with minor edits. Just make sure you're running the very latest kernel with CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED disabled (I think that's necessary, not entirely sure). You'll notice when anything but the current CVS version of HAL no longer displays network devices :/ > Can I ask how stable this byzantine path I am currently following to get > a "Management interface" for tx injection is going to be? Not even > standard wireless ioctl but Private IOCTL SIOCIWFIRSTPRIV+0 opens out > into a secret garden of "PRISM2" special features... is this already in > a little black refactoring book somewhere? Yup, it is. But there's still debate on whether it should be done through netlink (nl80211) or some new special injection format for the monitor interfaces like the management interface currently has. [you can rip code from wpa_supplicant to inject frames] Btw, here's another argument against the monitor interfaces: having them up takes the card out of powersave mode which they should only be while not associated, even with a userspace MLME. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
