Freshtel in Ukraine with Intel 6250 WiMAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Inaky.

Thank you for your reply. I've solved the first issue for me, as you may 
see in my previous replies - I managed to get work wimax on 64-bit after 
applying Paul Donohue's patches.

The second is much complicated and I made some scripts for me basing on 
those which are published in Internet (like this 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/513139) 
to turn off Wifi and turn on Wimax (see at http://ge.tt/7T8cqay), as 
well as to try to respond to different stati of Wimax module analysing 
wimaxcu responses, but they are not stable and demand /dev/hands to be 
applied :).

I've posted this idea on Ubuntu brainstorming page and hope that the 
work which is currently doing by Dan Williams with NM 
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager) can be 
finalised in the nearest future.

With kind regards,
Oleksa Stasevych

05.03.11 01:28, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez ???????(??):
> Hello
>
> Sorry for the very late response, my inbox is a mess
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 21:36 +0200, Oleksa Stasevych wrote:
>> Hi Inaky, friends.
>>
>> Continuing my last post, I can say, that I was successful connecting
>> with Freshtel (one of Kyiv WIMAX provider) but only under 32-bit
>> architecture (Ubuntu 11.04 Alpha2 i386). But at the most I use 64-bit
>> Ubuntu, which is installed on my PC and I don't want to replace it.
>>
>> Do you see some light at the end of tunnel with libpthread
>> segmentation fault vs. 64-bit Linux?
>
> Not really -- we don't have anyone available to work on this, and even
> patch integration is in a very delayed time schedule now. :(
>
>> Also, playing with wimaxcu connect/dconnect, enabling wifi/disabling
>> wimax I found a lot of inconveniences when I had to modprobe and rmmod
>> iwlagn manually in order to make work either WiMAX or WiFi. Can you
>> suggest some useful utils, which can make this trivial operation
>> simple? Line Inter PROSet does?
>
> Nope, there is nothing, sorry. Similar to what I mentioned before, there
> is none looking at solving this permanently. We have designs or
> architectures on how it should be properly solved, but no resources to
> implement them.
>
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Linux Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux