On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:53 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2008, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Ugh, that thing really does need a rewrite with a *NIX-style build > > system (even eclipse project files would work). First, it should be > > New releases (due this week or next) use automake, so that part is better > now. > > > using correct CFLAGS for the architecture in question (-m32 or -m64 or > > whatever) as determined by a configure script, second the directory > > structure is really quite weird for a *NIX project and looks quite a bit > > like a Windows port which it probably is. > > I'll let Jayant reply to this one. > > > ... > > Marcel/Inaky, what's the status on the supplicant? Any progress getting > > other supplicants to work instead of the binary supplicant? Is anyone > > I'll let Jayant reply to this one also, as he has way more knowledge than I do. > > > doing an open-source OMA-DM client that you're aware of, maybe Intel has > > one they'd be willing to open-source? Any open OMA-DM code from > > anywhere would be a great starting point. > > I have no idea; I know funambol had something, but as far as I was told from > somebody (I can't remember whom), it is not sufficient. Inside Intel we were > thinking about it, but there are no concrete plans as of now. Probably it was me, I've looked at it before and while it's OMA, it's not OMA-DM. It's just the sync portions I think, nothing about DM exists there yet that I could see. Might be a base to start from though. Dan
