General suggestions for the network service code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 09 October 2008, Dan Williams wrote:
> 
> Ugh, that thing really does need a rewrite with a *NIX-style build
> system (even eclipse project files would work).  First, it should be

New releases (due this week or next) use automake, so that part is better 
now.

> using correct CFLAGS for the architecture in question (-m32 or -m64 or
> whatever) as determined by a configure script, second the directory
> structure is really quite weird for a *NIX project and looks quite a bit
> like a Windows port which it probably is.

I'll let Jayant reply to this one.

> ...
> Marcel/Inaky, what's the status on the supplicant?  Any progress getting
> other supplicants to work instead of the binary supplicant?  Is anyone

I'll let Jayant reply to this one also, as he has way more knowledge than I do.

> doing an open-source OMA-DM client that you're aware of, maybe Intel has
> one they'd be willing to open-source?  Any open OMA-DM code from
> anywhere would be a great starting point.

I have no idea; I know funambol had something, but as far as I was told from 
somebody (I can't remember whom), it is not sufficient. Inside Intel we were
thinking about it, but there are no concrete plans as of now.

-- 
Inaky


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Linux Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux