On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 18:10 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > First two ones I plan to tackle ASAP. The dynamic_printk() stuff might take > longer and I was wondering if you would be ok with changing that post-29 in > case I were about to miss the merge window (got a few very busy weeks > ahead of me). Fine with me, I guess, I don't even know if the dynprintk is applicable (though I'd rather see you make it work if it isn't than add yet another huge debug macro file :) ) johannes
