Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: imx7ulp_wdt: Clarify timing units

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 27.10.24 um 15:28 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
On 10/27/24 03:53, Stefan Wahren wrote:
imx7ulp_wdt mixes a lot of timing units (frequency, clocks, seconds)
in a not obvious way. So improve readability of imx7ulp_wdt by
clarifying the relevant units.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
index 0f13a3053357..0f92d2217088 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/imx7ulp_wdt.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
  #define WDOG_CS_PRES        BIT(12)
  #define WDOG_CS_ULK        BIT(11)
  #define WDOG_CS_RCS        BIT(10)
-#define LPO_CLK            0x1
+#define LPO_CLK            0x1    /* 32 kHz */

This configures the clock source to be the LPO clock, which according
to the
chip datasheets is a 1kHz clock for all chips except IMX93. It is only
32kHz
for IMX93, and the prescaler is enabled for that chip.

The comment is not only misleading because it selects the clock source,
not the rate, but wrong, because it only selects a 32kHz clock for IMX93,
and that value is then prescaled.
Okay, I will drop it

  #define LPO_CLK_SHIFT        8
  #define WDOG_CS_CLK        (LPO_CLK << LPO_CLK_SHIFT)
  #define WDOG_CS_EN        BIT(7)
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
  #define UNLOCK_SEQ1    0xD928
  #define UNLOCK        ((UNLOCK_SEQ1 << 16) | UNLOCK_SEQ0)

-#define DEFAULT_TIMEOUT    60
-#define MAX_TIMEOUT    128
+#define DEFAULT_TIMEOUT    60    /* seconds */
+#define MAX_TIMEOUT    128    /* seconds */
  #define WDOG_CLOCK_RATE    1000
  #define WDOG_ULK_WAIT_TIMEOUT    1000
  #define WDOG_RCS_WAIT_TIMEOUT    10000
@@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ static const struct watchdog_info
imx7ulp_wdt_info = {
              WDIOF_MAGICCLOSE,
  };

-static int _imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt,
unsigned int timeout, unsigned int cs)
+static int _imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt,
+                 unsigned int timeout_clks, unsigned int cs)

I don't think "_clks" adds any clarity because the value doesn't set a
"clock".
"_ticks", maybe.
I'm fine with _ticks

Thanks

  {
      u32 val;
      int ret;
@@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ static int _imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct
imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt, unsigned int timeou
          goto init_out;

      /* set an initial timeout value in TOVAL */
-    writel(timeout, wdt->base + WDOG_TOVAL);
+    writel(timeout_clks, wdt->base + WDOG_TOVAL);
      writel(cs, wdt->base + WDOG_CS);
      local_irq_enable();
      ret = imx7ulp_wdt_wait_rcs(wdt);
@@ -275,7 +276,8 @@ static int _imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct
imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt, unsigned int timeou
      return ret;
  }

-static int imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt, unsigned
int timeout)
+static int imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt,
+                unsigned int timeout_clks)
  {
      /* enable 32bit command sequence and reconfigure */
      u32 val = WDOG_CS_CMD32EN | WDOG_CS_CLK | WDOG_CS_UPDATE |
@@ -296,11 +298,11 @@ static int imx7ulp_wdt_init(struct
imx7ulp_wdt_device *wdt, unsigned int timeout
      }

      do {
-        ret = _imx7ulp_wdt_init(wdt, timeout, val);
+        ret = _imx7ulp_wdt_init(wdt, timeout_clks, val);
          toval = readl(wdt->base + WDOG_TOVAL);
          cs = readl(wdt->base + WDOG_CS);
          cs &= ~(WDOG_CS_FLG | WDOG_CS_ULK | WDOG_CS_RCS);
-    } while (--loop > 0 && (cs != val || toval != timeout || ret));
+    } while (--loop > 0 && (cs != val || toval != timeout_clks ||
ret));

      if (loop == 0)
          return -EBUSY;
--
2.34.1









[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux