Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] watchdog: hpe-wdt: don't print out if registering watchdog fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 07:23:19AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 03:29:09PM -0600, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The core will do this already.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/watchdog/gxp-wdt.c | 4 +---
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Question:  should email have been titled
> > 	"watchdog: gxp-wdt: ..."
> > instead of
> > 	"watchdog: hpe-wdt: ..."
> > 
> > to match the module name as the email title gets put into
> > the git log for the file?
> 
> No objection, we can do that. I check git-log for the prefixes and found
> there the following:
> 
> 6b47441bed49 ("watchdog: hpe-wdt: Introduce HPE GXP Watchdog")

That is somewhat unfortunate as it will can lead to confusion with
the long standing hpwdt.  These are different watchdogs.

Jerry
> 
> I am fine with both.
> 



-- 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann                  Software Engineer   Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux