Re: [RFC PATCH 3/9] watchdog: hpe-wdt: don't print out if registering watchdog fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 03:29:09PM -0600, Jerry Hoemann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:03:06PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The core will do this already.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/watchdog/gxp-wdt.c | 4 +---
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Question:  should email have been titled
> 	"watchdog: gxp-wdt: ..."
> instead of
> 	"watchdog: hpe-wdt: ..."
> 
> to match the module name as the email title gets put into
> the git log for the file?

No objection, we can do that. I check git-log for the prefixes and found
there the following:

6b47441bed49 ("watchdog: hpe-wdt: Introduce HPE GXP Watchdog")

I am fine with both.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux