Hi Claudiu,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 10:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Check return status of
> pm_runtime_put()
>
> Hi, Biju,
>
> On 31.01.2024 12:32, Biju Das wrote:
> > Hi Claudiu,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 10:20 AM
> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Check return status of
> >> pm_runtime_put()
> >>
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> pm_runtime_put() may return an error code. Check its return status.
> >>
> >> Along with it the rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout() function was updated to
> >> propagate the result of rzg2l_wdt_stop() to its caller.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2cbc5cd0b55f ("watchdog: Add Watchdog Timer driver for
> >> RZ/G2L")
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - propagate the return code of rzg2l_wdt_stop() to it's callers
> >>
> >> drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c | 11 +++++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> >> b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c index d87d4f50180c..7bce093316c4
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> >> @@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_start(struct
> >> watchdog_device
> >> *wdev) static int rzg2l_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdev) {
> >> struct rzg2l_wdt_priv *priv = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdev);
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> rzg2l_wdt_reset(priv);
> >> - pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> >> +
> >> + ret = pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + return ret;
> >
> > Do we need to check the return code? So far we didn't hit this
> condition.
> > If you are planning to do it, then just
> >
> > return pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
>
> pm_runtime_put() may return 1 if the device is suspended (which is not
> considered error) as explained here:
Oops, I missed that discussion. Out of curiosity,
What watchdog framework/consumer is going to do with a
Non-error return value of 1?
Cheers,
Biju
