Hi Claudiu,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 10:20 AM
> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] watchdog: rzg2l_wdt: Check return status of
> pm_runtime_put()
>
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> pm_runtime_put() may return an error code. Check its return status.
>
> Along with it the rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout() function was updated to
> propagate the result of rzg2l_wdt_stop() to its caller.
>
> Fixes: 2cbc5cd0b55f ("watchdog: Add Watchdog Timer driver for RZ/G2L")
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - propagate the return code of rzg2l_wdt_stop() to it's callers
>
> drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> index d87d4f50180c..7bce093316c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/rzg2l_wdt.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_start(struct watchdog_device
> *wdev) static int rzg2l_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdev) {
> struct rzg2l_wdt_priv *priv = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdev);
> + int ret;
>
> rzg2l_wdt_reset(priv);
> - pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Do we need to check the return code? So far we didn't hit this condition.
If you are planning to do it, then just
return pm_runtime_put(wdev->parent);
Cheers,
Biju
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -163,7 +167,10 @@ static int rzg2l_wdt_set_timeout(struct
> watchdog_device *wdev, unsigned int time
> * to reset the module) so that it is updated with new timeout
> values.
> */
> if (watchdog_active(wdev)) {
> - rzg2l_wdt_stop(wdev);
> + ret = rzg2l_wdt_stop(wdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = rzg2l_wdt_start(wdev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.2
