On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:43:07 +0000 Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:37:38PM +0800, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:41:37 +0100 > > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 18/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I have real doubts that you ever tested your entire solution > > > >> with this binding. Where is the DTS? > > > >> > > > > > > > > Currently, the DTS is still in internal and yet to upstream as > > > > it depends on [1]. > > > > > > Yeah, so you send untested code which cannot work or pass tests. > > > If you do not test your code, we need to be able to at least > > > verify it, so send your DTS. Otherwise I cannot trust that this > > > works at all. > > Will submit it with DTS once things have cleared up. > > Thanks for the comment. > > [1] is not going to applied for a while since the SoC doesn't actually > exist yet and is pre-tapeout on an FPGA. I would just send the dts > patch adding the watchdog alongside the series, or else you'll be > waiting for quite a while. Or even link to the node on github or > whatever. > Ok, will add the watchdog dts alongside this series and mention its dependency on [1]. Thanks.
