On 09/06/2023 14:09, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> >>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here? >>> >>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it >>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept >>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this >>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you >>> still prefer to add it back? >> >> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not >> in the other. >> > > As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this. > ok Best regards, Krzysztof
