On 09.06.2023 13:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: [ ... ] > >>>> + properties: >>>> + clocks: >>>> + minItems: 2 >>>> + clock-names: >>>> + items: >>>> + - const: pclk >>>> + - const: gclk >>> >>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here? >> >> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it >> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept >> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this >> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you >> still prefer to add it back? > > I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not > in the other. > As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this.
