On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 09:16 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 18:51 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * Make sure the watchdog is serviced. > > > + * > > > + * The firmware followed by U-Boot leaves the watchdog > > > running > > > + * with the default threshold 60 seconds. Our default > > > timeout > > > is > > > + * 90 seconds, but internal worker divides it by two, > > > which > > > is > > > + * 45 seconds and should be enough (less by 15 seconds > > > than > > > + * threshold). > > > + */ > > > + set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdt_dev->status); > > > > Giving one more thought here perhaps more robust will be to start > > watchdog unconditionally here? > > Yes, that would be another option, and it sounds like a good idea. > Let me know if you want to do that. Yes, I prefer it over the rest of solutions. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html