Re: pre-timeout again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:19:28PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On 08/24/2016 03:35 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'd really like to see pretimeout support added in v4.9. Can't I just
> >resend my latest series (since Vladimir's latest series had some issues
> >which were already fixed in mine IIRC)? I still think this provides a
> >solid ground where Vladimir could add the missing features on top. I can
> >remove my copyright line, too, if that is important.
> 
> copyright is not an issue for me, the authorship is.
> 
> I'm not sure about the diff of the known issues between your and my series,
> IIRC the changes you had sent one day were not reviewed thoroughly.
> 
> >It's a bit sad that I have time assigned to this task but am basically
> >blocked currently. Or were there other issues I forgot?
> >
> 
> It's a bit sad that two your patches were not integrated to v4.8:
> 
>   http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-watchdog/msg09484.html
> 
I don't recall seeing v3. Did I miss it ?

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux