On 08.06.2016 16:53, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 06/08/2016 06:37 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > >>>> >>>> +comment "Watchdog Pretimeout Governors" >>>> + >>>> +config WATCHDOG_PRETIMEOUT_GOV >>>> + bool "Enable watchdog pretimeout governors" >>>> + default n >>> >>> I don't think 'default n" is needed. >>> >> >> No strict objections, but probably 'default n' may save quite many >> lines in defconfigs. >> > > I always wondered why it would be necessary to say "default n". > What is the difference between "default n" and no explicit default ? > I pointed out that it may have impact on defconfig, but experimentally it has no effect. Users of "make oldconfig" get a prompt in both cases as well. Also I haven't found any difference for silentoldconfig, olddefconfig and alldefconfig, I assume explicit "default n" and "def_bool n" can be safely dropped. -- Best wishes, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
