On 08.06.2016 10:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> +static void pretimeout_noop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>> +{
>> + pr_alert("watchdog pretimeout event\n");
>> +}
>
> My version said which watchdog caused the event, why not adding that?
>
I will add it. It's a bit sad that a virtual volatile id is reported,
but it is better than nothing...
Best wishes,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
