On 02/29/2016 08:23 PM, 河合英宏 / KAWAI，HIDEHIRO wrote:
Hi Corey,
Thanks for the review.
Sure, this is a good idea.
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix
re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field
was added in the commit you reference.
Yes. So, I'll change the description to more proper one.
Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another
way to get this patch into the kernel?
I don't have another way, and I don't know how cross-subsystem
patch set should be handled.
I think it would be better this patch set is managed by one person
because both PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 depend on 1/3.
We'll need an Ack from someone with authority over kernel/panic.c.
If someone sends an Ack, the series can go through IPMI (or watchdog).
It might be easier though if Andrew would take the entire series.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
