On 01/19/2016 02:32 AM, Mason wrote:
On 18/01/2016 21:27, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 01/18/2016 11:50 AM, Mason wrote:
Requested by arm-soc maintainer Kevin Hilman in v9 review.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/456331
The reference should be after the '---' (it doesn't explain
the changes, but provides a reference to the change request),
and the explanation should be what you have after '---' below,
ie that the architecture is tango, that the 'x' is a wildcard,
and that it therefore makes more sense to use ARCH_TANGO
instead of ARCH_TANGOX.
Hello Guenter,
Thanks for the review.
For the commit message, I am just following Michael's advice:
(one of the clk maintainers)
"Just a single line explaining that the change was requested by the
arm-soc devs in the commit log is helpful. I typically reference these
discussions in the commit log with a link"
I'd have expected that as a comment, not in the commit log.
Michael, is that something new ? It isn't really obvious in the drivers/clk
logs and appears to be quite unusual.
Guenter
Note, I submitted the same patch to clk.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.clk/3164
I'd rather have the same commit message for all these trivial fixups.
Can this fix be pushed into 4.5 ?
Depends. Is the definition of ARCH_TANGO going to make it in ?
Indeed.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-tango/Kconfig
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html