Hi Guenter, > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:54:27PM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > Hi Guenter, > > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 04:27:11PM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > > > Hi Guneter, > > > > > > > > > I have a number of patches pending in my watchdog-next branch which are not > > > > > in your watchdog-next repository. Below is a summary, rebased onto your > > > > > repository. This does not include the patches I had submitted. > > > > > > > > > > Please consider those patches for v4.5. > > > > > > > > I'm still working on those. Will be for this evening. I left those because they are all new drivers. I wanted to have all fixes and other patches first. > > > > So not finished yet :-) I will also add your dev fixes (V2 patchset containing 5 patches). > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > No problem. I think we now have all patches that should go in for v4.5 . > > > > There is off course still other stuff that I need to look at: > > SBSA, pretimeout, bcm63xx, stmp3xxx GETBOOTSTATUS (although I have the impression that this patch is a dead end because you cannot really tell what the reboot reason is with the patch), soft timer's moving into the core, mei watchdog code, ... > Hi Wim, > > I'll have to look into those again as well. Most will now conflict > with the new watchdog core code. > > Any thoughts on the other patch series I sent out, to create the watchdog > device in watchdog_dev.c, and to handle reference counting in the watchdog > core ? That would be a prerequisite for me to rebase (and rework) the soft > timer handling core. I had hoped that the changes to handle reference > counting in the core could make it into 4.5. Need to review this 6-part patchset still. But probably still possible for 4.5 . The soft-timer patches are also 4.6 at the earliest. Kind regards, Wim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
