Am Freitag, den 07.08.2015, 06:40 -0700 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On 08/06/2015 09:36 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > The DA9063 watchdog occasionally enters error condition and resets the > > system if the timeout is changed quickly after the timer was enabled. > > > > The method of disabling and waiting for > 150 µs before setting the > > new timeout is taken from the DA9052 driver. > > > Using sleep concerns me a bit, since during that time the watchdog > is disabled. Bad enough that we have to do this to start with, > but using usleep adds more risk to an already bad situation. > > How about udelay() instead ? Ok, I'll change it. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
