On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Matt Fleming wrote: > From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx> > > Intel Sunrisepoint (Skylake PCH) has the iTCO watchdog accessible across > the SMBus, unlike previous generations of PCH/ICH where it was on the > LPC bus. Because it's on the SMBus, it doesn't make sense to pass around > a 'struct lpc_ich_info', and leaking the type of bus into the iTCO > watchdog driver is kind of backwards anyway. > > This change introduces a new 'struct iTCO_wdt_platform_data' for use > inside the iTCO watchdog driver and by the upcoming Intel Sunrisepoint > code, which neatly avoids having to include lpc_ich headers in the i801 > i2c driver. > > A simple translation layer is provided for converting from the existing > 'struct lpc_ich_info' inside the lpc_ich mfd driver. Is this patch related to Andy's patch-set? https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/27/599 > Cc: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c | 11 +++++------ > include/linux/mfd/lpc_ich.h | 6 ------ > include/linux/platform_data/iTCO_wdt.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/iTCO_wdt.h How are all of these changes related? Why do they all have to be in a single patch? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
