On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:02 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:20:30AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > > If people are ok with something similar as in this patchset where > > we have both vhost_tasks and kthreads, then I can send something. > > > It would be better, as you say, to modify the vhost_task code so it can > emulate the kthread behavior. However, given that apparently some users > are unhappy, what you describe would be a good stopgap solution > until we have that. > > The main difficulty seems to be to describe what the > behaviour is, exactly, so userspace can make informed > decisions on what to use. Exactly. Thanks > > -- > MST >
