On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 03:47:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> OK, now it makes more sense ;) I have absolutely no objections to
> prefering scoped NO{FS,IO} interfaces of course. And that would indeed
> eliminate a need for defining GFP_NO{FS,IO}_NOFAIL alternatives.
Yes. My proposal would be:
GFP_NOFAIL without any modifiers it the only valid nofail API.
File systems / drivers can combine іt with the scoped nofs/noio if
needed.
