Re: [PATCH RFC 5/5] non-mm: discourage the usage of __GFP_NOFAIL and encourage GFP_NOFAIL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:53:49AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> GFP_KERNEL_NOFAIL which is GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL
> 
> And probably also GFP_NOFS_NOFAIL and GFP_NOIO_NOFAIL (sigh).

Let's not add these and force people to use the scope API which
we're trying to move to.  I think we should be able to simply
have GFP_NOFAIL which includes GFP_KERNEL and no variant.





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux